ANUJ KUMAR BORAH vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR Advocate - PP, ASSAM — Crl.Pet./611/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010084972026

e-Filing Number

30-04-2026

Filing Number

Crl.Pet./3657/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

Crl.Pet./611/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mrs. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund

Coram

Honourable Mrs. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10263 - Criminal Revisions for quashing of criminal proceeding ( 221 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANUJ KUMAR BORAH

    Adv. MR. P K SARMA,MS. B BHUYAN,MS. B BHUYAN, ,MS. P KAKATI,MS R SAHIN,MS. B BHUYAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor), ASSAM

  2. 2.AJIMUDDIN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Honourable Mrs. Justice Susmita Phukan KhaundView PDF

    Case Summary: Anuj Kumar Borah sought to quash NBWA (Non-Bailable Warrant of Apprehension) and P&A (Police Assistance) orders issued against him by the JMFC Sonitpur. The Gauhati High Court held that since the petitioner was willing to appear before the trial court and cooperate with proceedings, and considering his family circumstances (father's neck fracture), the court kept the warrants in abeyance until 28.05.2026 and directed his appearance before the trial court by that date to avoid case procrastination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.Pet./611/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Anuj Kumar Borah sought to quash NBWA (Non-Bailable Warrant of Apprehension) and P&A (Police Assistance) orders issued against him by the JMFC Sonitpur. The Gauhati High Court held that since the petitioner was willing to appear before the trial court and cooperate with proceedings, and considering his family circumstances (father's neck fracture), the court kept the warrants in abeyance until 28.05.2026 and directed his appearance before the trial court by that date to avoid case procrastination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case