UTTAM KUMAR ROY AND 6 ORS vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS Advocate - SC, FOREST, ,SC, FINANCE,SC, BTC — WP(C)/2362/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section ART 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GAHC010084322026
e-Filing Number
29-04-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/4800/2026
Filing Date
29-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/2362/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10040 - Other service matters with respect to State Govt Employees. ( 40 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UTTAM KUMAR ROY AND 6 ORS
Adv. MR. M ISLAM,MS A KHATUN,MS A KHATUN, ,MS A KHATUN
-
2.ANIL CHANDRA ROY
-
3.MD. NUR ALOM SK.
-
4.MD. MIR MOSAROF HUSSAIN
-
5.JABENUR RAHMAN
-
6.MD. ASHRAB HOQUE
-
7.JAMIR UDDIN ALIAS JOMER UDDIN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS Advocate - SC, FOREST, ,SC, FINANCE,SC, BTC
-
2.THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
-
3.THE BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL (BTC)
-
4.THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, BTC
-
5.THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST AND HOFF, ASSAM
-
6.THE ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS-CUM-CHD, BTC
-
7.THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER
-
8.THE FOREST RANGE OFFICER
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
08-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C) 2362/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned. The Gauhati High Court issued notice to respondents (returnable within four weeks) and listed the matter for hearing after the returnable date. All respondent authorities were represented in court, so formal notices were waived. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/2362/2026
Case Summary: WP(C) 2362/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned. The Gauhati High Court issued notice to respondents (returnable within four weeks) and listed the matter for hearing after the returnable date. All respondent authorities were represented in court, so formal notices were waived. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts