K LALRUADTIKA vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND ANR Advocate - SC, CUSTOMS — I.A.(Crl.)/494/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: --Disposed Of on 01st June 2026.
CNR: GAHC010083582026
e-Filing Number
28-04-2026
Filing Number
I.A.(Crl.)/3607/2026
Filing Date
28-Apr-2026
Registration No
I.A.(Crl.)/494/2026
Registration Date
12-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10302 - Interlocutory Application (Criminal) ( 383 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
01-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Of
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.K LALRUADTIKA
Adv. MR. S C BISWAS,MS. S. CHANDA,MS. S. CHANDA, ,MS. K L R YANTHAN,MS. U NANDA,MR. F A HASSAN,MS. S. CHANDA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE UNION OF INDIA AND ANR Advocate - SC, CUSTOMS
-
2.THE INSPECTOR,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar KalitaView PDF
Summary of I.A.(Crl.)/494/2026 The Gauhati High Court allowed K Lalruadtika's interlocutory application seeking correction of the cause title in Criminal Petition 538/2026. The court permitted rectification to reflect that the Union of India is represented by Standing Counsel, Customs Department instead of Standing Counsel, NCB, with the corrected cause title to be submitted by June 10, 2026. The Customs Department did not object to the prayer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. I.A.(Crl.)/494/2026
Summary of I.A.(Crl.)/494/2026 The Gauhati High Court allowed K Lalruadtika's interlocutory application seeking correction of the cause title in Criminal Petition 538/2026. The court permitted rectification to reflect that the Union of India is represented by Standing Counsel, Customs Department instead of Standing Counsel, NCB, with the corrected cause title to be submitted by June 10, 2026. The Customs Department did not object to the prayer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts