NAGENDRA LAL CHOUDHURY vs SATYA RANJAN PANDA AND 3 ORS. — Cont.Cas(C)/223/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section SEC. 11, SEC. 12. Status: Motion. Next hearing: : -.

Motion Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010080432026

e-Filing Number

24-04-2026

Filing Number

Cont.Cas(C)/4557/2026

Filing Date

24-Apr-2026

Registration No

Cont.Cas(C)/223/2026

Registration Date

27-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10200 - Contempt Petition (Civil). ( 178 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section SEC. 11, SEC. 12
Constitution of India Section ART. 215

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAGENDRA LAL CHOUDHURY

    Adv. MR. T K MISRA,MR. P K MUNIR,MR. P K MUNIR, ,MR. A. GAYAN,DIPTI CHAKRAVARTY,MR. P K MUNIR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SATYA RANJAN PANDA AND 3 ORS.

  2. 2.SARAT KALITA

  3. 3.SAROJ RANJAN NAYAK

  4. 4.ASHWANI KUMAR

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan NairView PDF

    Case Summary: Nagendra Lal Choudhury filed a contempt petition against UCO Bank officials (Satya Ranjan Panda, Sarat Kalita, Saroj Ranjan Nayak, and Ashwani Kumar) alleging violation of court directions from an earlier order dated 03.06.2025 in WP(C) No.6360/2016. The petitioner's writ appeal against that order was dismissed by a Division Bench on 11.02.2026. The court issued notice to the respondents returnable in four weeks, directed the petitioner to serve notice via speed post within two working days, and dispensed with personal appearance of respondents for the time being. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cont.Cas(C)/223/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Nagendra Lal Choudhury filed a contempt petition against UCO Bank officials (Satya Ranjan Panda, Sarat Kalita, Saroj Ranjan Nayak, and Ashwani Kumar) alleging violation of court directions from an earlier order dated 03.06.2025 in WP(C) No.6360/2016. The petitioner's writ appeal against that order was dismissed by a Division Bench on 11.02.2026. The court issued notice to the respondents returnable in four weeks, directed the petitioner to serve notice via speed post within two working days, and dispensed with personal appearance of respondents for the time being. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case