SMTI ALOKJAN BIBI AND ORS vs NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Advocate - MR. A K BHATTACHARYYA — I.A.(Civil)/1336/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 20th May 2026.

CNR: GAHC010080312026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

24-04-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/4548/2026

Filing Date

24-04-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/1336/2026

Registration Date

28-04-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA

Coram

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

20th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

SMTI ALOKJAN BIBI AND ORS

Adv. MR. P A AHMED

GADULI BEWA

ANOWAR MANDAL

MONOWAR MANDAL

Respondent(s)

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Advocate - MR. A K BHATTACHARYYA

SUNIL KR PRADHANI

TITUN MAZUMDAR

Orders

20-05-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA

Case Summary: The Gauhati High Court granted the interlocutory application filed by the claimants (Smti Alokjan Bibi and others) against National Insurance Company Limited. The court directed the Registry to disburse 50% of the awarded amount (Rs. 8,64,650/-) that had been deposited by the Insurance Company, with no objection from the respondent. The claimants were required to furnish a bond equivalent to the deposited amount and undergo proper verification before receiving the disbursement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Gauhati High Court granted the interlocutory application filed by the claimants (Smti Alokjan Bibi and others) against National Insurance Company Limited. The court directed the Registry to disburse 50% of the awarded amount (Rs. 8,64,650/-) that had been deposited by the Insurance Company, with no objection from the respondent. The claimants were required to furnish a bond equivalent to the deposited amount and undergo proper verification before receiving the disbursement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case