SMTI ALOKJAN BIBI AND ORS vs NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Advocate - MR. A K BHATTACHARYYA — I.A.(Civil)/1336/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 20th May 2026.
CNR: GAHC010080312026
e-Filing Number
24-04-2026
Filing Number
I.A.(Civil)/4548/2026
Filing Date
24-Apr-2026
Registration No
I.A.(Civil)/1336/2026
Registration Date
28-Apr-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
20-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMTI ALOKJAN BIBI AND ORS
Adv. MR. P A AHMED
-
2.GADULI BEWA
-
3.ANOWAR MANDAL
-
4.MONOWAR MANDAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Advocate - MR. A K BHATTACHARYYA
-
2.SUNIL KR PRADHANI
-
3.TITUN MAZUMDAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar KalitaView PDF
Case Summary: The Gauhati High Court granted the interlocutory application filed by the claimants (Smti Alokjan Bibi and others) against National Insurance Company Limited. The court directed the Registry to disburse 50% of the awarded amount (Rs. 8,64,650/-) that had been deposited by the Insurance Company, with no objection from the respondent. The claimants were required to furnish a bond equivalent to the deposited amount and undergo proper verification before receiving the disbursement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/1336/2026
Case Summary: The Gauhati High Court granted the interlocutory application filed by the claimants (Smti Alokjan Bibi and others) against National Insurance Company Limited. The court directed the Registry to disburse 50% of the awarded amount (Rs. 8,64,650/-) that had been deposited by the Insurance Company, with no objection from the respondent. The claimants were required to furnish a bond equivalent to the deposited amount and undergo proper verification before receiving the disbursement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts