AMAR MANDAL MRS PURABI HAZARIKA, ,MR D K BHATTACHARYYA,MR. B CHAKRABORTY vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR Advocate - PP, ASSAM — I.A.(Crl.)/377/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 430. Disposed: --Disposed Of on 05th May 2026.
CNR: GAHC010080302025
e-Filing Number
09-04-2025
Filing Number
I.A.(Crl.)/3408/2025
Filing Date
10-Apr-2025
Registration No
I.A.(Crl.)/377/2025
Registration Date
21-Apr-2025
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Michael Zothankhuma , Honourable Mr. Justice Rajesh Mazumdar
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Michael Zothankhuma , Honourable Mr. Justice Rajesh Mazumdar
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
10302 - Interlocutory Application (Criminal) ( 383 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Of
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AMAR MANDAL MRS PURABI HAZARIKA, ,MR D K BHATTACHARYYA,MR. B CHAKRABORTY
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor), ASSAM
-
2.SMTI. KABITA PATAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Michael Zothankhuma,honourable Mr. Justice Rajesh MazumdarView PDF
Case Summary: The Gauhati High Court rejected Amar Mandal's application under Section 430 BNSS to suspend his sentence for conviction under Section 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The appellant argued he and the victim were in a consensual relationship and that trial evidence did not conclusively prove the offense; however, the court declined to grant relief at this interim stage, with the main appeal hearing scheduled for June 8, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Orders
Honourable Mr. Justice Michael Zothankhuma , Honourable Mr. Justice Pranjal Das
-
23-Apr-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Medhi,honourable Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla LongkumerView PDF
-
10-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. I.A.(Crl.)/377/2025
Case Summary: The Gauhati High Court rejected Amar Mandal's application under Section 430 BNSS to suspend his sentence for conviction under Section 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The appellant argued he and the victim were in a consensual relationship and that trial evidence did not conclusively prove the offense; however, the court declined to grant relief at this interim stage, with the main appeal hearing scheduled for June 8, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts