DR PH HEROJIT SINGH AND ANR vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS Advocate - DY.S.G.I., ,MR. D J DAS — WP(C)/2317/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010080022026

e-Filing Number

23-04-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/4525/2026

Filing Date

23-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/2317/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10060 - Other service matters with respect to Service of Local Bodies, Banks, State & Central Public Sector Undertaking, Statutory Bodies and Universities a ( 60 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DR PH HEROJIT SINGH AND ANR

    Adv. D K BHUYAN,MR H BETALA,MR H BETALA, ,J GOSWAMEE,MR H BETALA

  2. 2.DR H LALRINTLUANGA,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS Advocate - DY.S.G.I., ,MR. D J DAS

  2. 2.DIRECTOR GENERAL CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE,

  3. 3.ADDL. DIRECTOR GENERAL (MEDICAL)

  4. 4.THE SECRETARRY (PERSONAL)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C)/2317/2026 The Gauhati High Court admitted a writ petition filed by two Chief Dental Surgeons of CRPF alleging hostile discrimination in comparison to other Medical Officers. The court issued notice returnable within four weeks and directed respondents to complete their pleadings and file necessary affidavits. The matter was adjourned for hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/2317/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C)/2317/2026 The Gauhati High Court admitted a writ petition filed by two Chief Dental Surgeons of CRPF alleging hostile discrimination in comparison to other Medical Officers. The court issued notice returnable within four weeks and directed respondents to complete their pleadings and file necessary affidavits. The matter was adjourned for hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case