MD KUDDUS ALI vs THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Advocate - MR. S K GOSWAMI, ,MS P SARMA,MR. R SHARMA — I.A.(Civil)/1247/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 07th May 2026.

CNR: GAHC010077592026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

21-04-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/4389/2026

Filing Date

21-04-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/1247/2026

Registration Date

22-04-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA

Coram

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

MD KUDDUS ALI

Adv. MR. M KHAN, ,KAKALI DEVI,MR. J RAHMAN

Respondent(s)

THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Advocate - MR. S K GOSWAMI, ,MS P SARMA,MR. R SHARMA

Hearing History

Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA

07-05-2026

ORDERS

Orders

27-04-2026
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER
07-05-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA

Case Summary: MD KUDDUS ALI v. ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. The Gauhati High Court corrected a clerical error in a prior Motor Accident Claims appeal order. The court rectified language stating Rs. 1,58,339 "has been deposited" by Oriental Insurance to instead read "has to be deposited" before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bongaigaon expeditiously, as the insurance company had not actually made the deposit yet. Both parties consented to this correction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MD KUDDUS ALI v. ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. The Gauhati High Court corrected a clerical error in a prior Motor Accident Claims appeal order. The court rectified language stating Rs. 1,58,339 "has been deposited" by Oriental Insurance to instead read "has to be deposited" before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bongaigaon expeditiously, as the insurance company had not actually made the deposit yet. Both parties consented to this correction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case