ABUL HUSSAIN vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS Advocate - GA, ASSAM — WP(C)/2698/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section ART 226. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Next hearing 19-Jun-2026

CNR: GAHC010077572026

e-Filing Number

21-04-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/4388/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/2698/2026

Registration Date

21-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10034 - Major punishment with respect to State Govt Employees. ( 34 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section ART 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABUL HUSSAIN

    Adv. MR H R CHOUDHURY,Z HUSSAIN,Z HUSSAIN, ,Z HUSSAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS Advocate - GA (Government Advocate), ASSAM

  2. 2.THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (ADMIN), ASSAM

  3. 3.THE SR. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIBHUMI

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    - For Motion -

    Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C)/2698/2026 - Abul Hussain v. The State of Assam The case was heard on 15.06.2026 before Justice Soumitra Saikia at the Gauhati High Court. Due to technical issues preventing the petitioner's counsel from connecting via video conferencing, the court accommodated the request for adjournment. The matter was relisted for 19.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Rajesh MazumdarView PDF

  6. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/2698/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C)/2698/2026 - Abul Hussain v. The State of Assam The case was heard on 15.06.2026 before Justice Soumitra Saikia at the Gauhati High Court. Due to technical issues preventing the petitioner's counsel from connecting via video conferencing, the court accommodated the request for adjournment. The matter was relisted for 19.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case