MD HAIDAR ALI vs JYOTISHMA PHUKAN — Crl.Pet./558/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GAHC010075442026
Next Hearing
: -
e-Filing Number
08-04-2026
Filing Number
Crl.Pet./3285/2026
Filing Date
08-04-2026
Registration No
Crl.Pet./558/2026
Registration Date
21-04-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Coram
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10263 - Criminal Revisions for quashing of criminal proceeding ( 221 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MD HAIDAR ALI
Adv. MR G ALAM,MR S R A NASER,MR S R A NASER, ,S K SARFRAJ KARIM,SAIDUL ROHMAN,N KAKOTI,MR S R A NASER
Respondent(s)
JYOTISHMA PHUKAN
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
MOTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | MOTION |
Orders
Summary of Crl.Pet./558/2026 The Gauhati High Court granted a stay of proceedings in the complaint case (C.R. No. 647/2025) filed by Jyotishma Phukan against her father MD Haidar Ali, finding justified grounds to suspend the trial court proceedings. The case involved allegations of attempted religious conversion and unauthorized property rental; the court considered the petitioner's age (67 years) and relationship as the complainant's father in granting the stay. Notice was issued to the respondent with a four-week return date, and trial court records were called for further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Crl.Pet./558/2026 The Gauhati High Court granted a stay of proceedings in the complaint case (C.R. No. 647/2025) filed by Jyotishma Phukan against her father MD Haidar Ali, finding justified grounds to suspend the trial court proceedings. The case involved allegations of attempted religious conversion and unauthorized property rental; the court considered the petitioner's age (67 years) and relationship as the complainant's father in granting the stay. Notice was issued to the respondent with a four-week return date, and trial court records were called for further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts