AZIM UDDIN CHOUDHURY AND 4 ORS. vs THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP, ASSAM, ,MD. ANARUL ISLAM,MR. J UDDIN,MR. M ALI — AB/779/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 08th May 2026.
CNR: GAHC010073192026
e-Filing Number
06-04-2026
Filing Number
AB/3194/2026
Filing Date
06-Apr-2026
Registration No
AB/779/2026
Registration Date
06-Apr-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Rajesh Mazumdar
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Rajesh Mazumdar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10267 - Anticipatory bail Application ( 309 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AZIM UDDIN CHOUDHURY AND 4 ORS.
Adv. MR J BORAH,MR. K KAKOTI,MR. K KAKOTI, ,MR N PATIRI,MR. K KAKOTI
-
2.ISLAM UDDIN CHOUDHURY
-
3.ASLAM UDDIN CHOUDHURY
-
4.BILAL HUSSAIN CHOUDHURY
-
5.BURHAN UDDIN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor), ASSAM, ,MD. ANARUL ISLAM,MR. J UDDIN,MR. M ALI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Rajesh MazumdarView PDF
The Gauhati High Court granted absolute pre-arrest bail to five petitioners during the investigation into Murajhar P.S Cases No. 30/2026 and 33/2026, finding that further custodial interrogation was unnecessary given the advanced stage of investigation. The court imposed conditions requiring the petitioners to appear before the Investigating Authority as needed, refrain from tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses, with violations risking bail cancellation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Motion (Ab)
Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia
-
07-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti SaikiaView PDF
-
06-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. AB/779/2026
The Gauhati High Court granted absolute pre-arrest bail to five petitioners during the investigation into Murajhar P.S Cases No. 30/2026 and 33/2026, finding that further custodial interrogation was unnecessary given the advanced stage of investigation. The court imposed conditions requiring the petitioners to appear before the Investigating Authority as needed, refrain from tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses, with violations risking bail cancellation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts