HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs JUNU NENDING AND ANR — I.A.(Civil)/1860/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section SEC. 5. Status: Orders. Next hearing: : -.

Orders Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010073032026

e-Filing Number

06-04-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/4115/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/1860/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section SEC. 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

    Adv. MR T KALITA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JUNU NENDING AND ANR

  2. 2.NENDING TATUNG

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF

    Case Summary: HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company Limited filed an application seeking condonation of 49 days' delay in preferring an appeal against a December 16, 2025 order by the Employee's Compensation Commissioner, Bongaigaon. The Gauhati High Court issued notice to the respondents (Junu Nending and Nending Tatung) returnable within four weeks, with service by speed post and usual process within one week. The matter was adjourned for hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/1860/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company Limited filed an application seeking condonation of 49 days' delay in preferring an appeal against a December 16, 2025 order by the Employee's Compensation Commissioner, Bongaigaon. The Gauhati High Court issued notice to the respondents (Junu Nending and Nending Tatung) returnable within four weeks, with service by speed post and usual process within one week. The matter was adjourned for hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case