ASMA KHATUN AND ORS vs THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD Advocate - MR. S K GOSWAMI — I.A.(Civil)/1204/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 09th June 2026.

CNR: GAHC010072742026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

06-04-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/4097/2026

Filing Date

06-04-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/1204/2026

Registration Date

20-04-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI

Coram

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

09th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

ASMA KHATUN AND ORS

Adv. MR. A R AGARWALA,MR ADITYA AGARWALA,MR ADITYA AGARWALA, ,MS. R LAILA,MD. K ALI,MR ADITYA AGARWALA

PARABINA KHATUN

MD. ISMAIL ALI

RADHIKA BEGUM

SADIKA BEGUM

Respondent(s)

THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD Advocate - MR. S K GOSWAMI

Orders

09-06-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI

Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/1204/2026 The Gauhati High Court corrected an erroneous observation in its prior order dated 08.03.2025 regarding an insurance claim dispute. The court clarified that Rs. 8,92,291/- previously deposited by Oriental Insurance Co Ltd was not withdrawn as mistakenly stated, and ordered the amount be released to claimant Asma Khatun upon proper identification. Both parties consented to this correction, and the interim application was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/1204/2026 The Gauhati High Court corrected an erroneous observation in its prior order dated 08.03.2025 regarding an insurance claim dispute. The court clarified that Rs. 8,92,291/- previously deposited by Oriental Insurance Co Ltd was not withdrawn as mistakenly stated, and ordered the amount be released to claimant Asma Khatun upon proper identification. Both parties consented to this correction, and the interim application was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case