PRADIP CHANDRA MEDHI AND ANR. vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS. Advocate - GA, ASSAM, ,SC, REVENUE,MS. S D SAIKIA — WP(C)/2224/2019

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010068302019

Filing Number

WP(C)/4243/2019

Filing Date

27-Mar-2019

Registration No

WP(C)/2224/2019

Registration Date

01-Apr-2019

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete

Category

10160 - Other land matters relating to Land Matters. ( 153 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRADIP CHANDRA MEDHI AND ANR.

    Adv. MR. R SARMA,MS B DEVI,MS B DEVI, ,MRS. G M D BAISHYA,MS B DEVI

  2. 2.DHANESWAR MEDHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS. Advocate - GA (Government Advocate), ASSAM, ,SC, REVENUE,MS. S D SAIKIA

  2. 2.THE DY. COMMISSIONER, KAMRUP(METRO)

  3. 3.THE CIRCLE OFFICER,

  4. 4.KIRAN KACHARI @ SWARGIARY

  5. 5.GOPI KACHARI @ SWARGIARY

  6. 6.KAMALESWAR KACHARI @ SWARGIARY

  7. 7.NAMESWAR KACHARI @ SWARGIARY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF

    The Gauhati High Court directed the Deputy Commissioner, Kamrup (Metro), to consider the petitioners' application for removing late Bhado Kachari's name from Khatian No. 22 in land records covering 10 Bighas 1 Katha 4 Lechas at Patgaon village. The court found that Bhado Kachari, who had executed a relinquishment deed in 2019, was never actually a tenant on the disputed land, and both the petitioners and Bhado Kachari's own sons sought his deletion from records. The Deputy Commissioner was directed to decide the matter within four months of receiving a fresh application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2020

    Admission

    Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury

  4. 13-Mar-2020

    Admission

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nelson Sailo

  5. 26-Feb-2020

    Admission

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nelson Sailo

  6. 10-Feb-2020

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nelson SailoView PDF

  7. 10-Feb-2020

    Admission

    Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury

  8. 22-Jan-2020

    Honourable Mr. Justice Manish ChoudhuryView PDF

  9. 30-Sep-2019

    Admission

    Honourable Mr. Justice Suman Shyam

  10. 02-Sep-2019

    Honourable Mr. Justice Suman ShyamView PDF

  11. 14-Jun-2019

    Admission

    Honourable Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan

  12. 03-Apr-2019

    Honourable Mr. Justice Ujjal BhuyanView PDF

  13. 27-Mar-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/2224/2019

  14. 01-Jan-1900

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

casestatus.in Summary

The Gauhati High Court directed the Deputy Commissioner, Kamrup (Metro), to consider the petitioners' application for removing late Bhado Kachari's name from Khatian No. 22 in land records covering 10 Bighas 1 Katha 4 Lechas at Patgaon village. The court found that Bhado Kachari, who had executed a relinquishment deed in 2019, was never actually a tenant on the disputed land, and both the petitioners and Bhado Kachari's own sons sought his deletion from records. The Deputy Commissioner was directed to decide the matter within four months of receiving a fresh application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case