MS DIVINE ASSOCIATES vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS Advocate - GA, ASSAM, ,SC, WATER RESOURCE — I.A.(Civil)/1179/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --Disposed Of on 06th May 2026.
CNR: GAHC010066112026
e-Filing Number
27-03-2026
Filing Number
I.A.(Civil)/3739/2026
Filing Date
27-Mar-2026
Registration No
I.A.(Civil)/1179/2026
Registration Date
07-Apr-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis Baruah
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis Baruah
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Of
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MS DIVINE ASSOCIATES
Adv. MR. D K JAIN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS Advocate - GA (Government Advocate), ASSAM, ,SC, WATER RESOURCE
-
2.SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
-
3.THE CHIEF ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
-
4.THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
-
5.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
-
6.THE UNION OF INDIA
-
7.THE BRAHMAPUTRA BOARD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis BaruahView PDF
Summary: The Gauhati High Court granted MS Divine Associates' application for impleadment, directing that the Union of India (Ministry of Jal Shakti) and the Brahmaputra Board be added as necessary parties to the accompanying writ petition. The court found their inclusion necessary because the water resources scheme under which the petitioner was awarded the contract was partly sponsored by the Central Government. The petitioner was directed to file a fresh Memo of Parties within seven days for updating in the court's CIS system. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/1179/2026
Summary: The Gauhati High Court granted MS Divine Associates' application for impleadment, directing that the Union of India (Ministry of Jal Shakti) and the Brahmaputra Board be added as necessary parties to the accompanying writ petition. The court found their inclusion necessary because the water resources scheme under which the petitioner was awarded the contract was partly sponsored by the Central Government. The petitioner was directed to file a fresh Memo of Parties within seven days for updating in the court's CIS system. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts