RAMESH SAIKIA vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS Advocate - GA, ASSAM — WP(C)/1893/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
CNR: GAHC010065162026
e-Filing Number
26-03-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/3688/2026
Filing Date
26-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/1893/2026
Registration Date
30-Mar-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10180 - Award of contracts by the State or its instrumentalities ( 172 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 01-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMESH SAIKIA
Adv. MR. A DEKA,R DEB,R DEB, ,MR. S BORTHAKUR,MS. S KAKATI,R DEB
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS Advocate - GA (Government Advocate), ASSAM
-
2.THE DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION
-
3.THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER, JORHAT
-
4.THE CO-DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
-
5.MARIANI MUNICIPAL BOARD
-
6.THE CHAIRPERSON
-
7.THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER
-
8.UTPAL GOGOI
-
9.LAKHYAJIT GOGOI
Case History
-
04-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-May-2026
Motion
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury
-
01-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish ChoudhuryView PDF
Summary: The Gauhati High Court issued notice on a writ petition filed by Ramesh Saikia challenging a tender process conducted by the Mariani Municipal Board for Zone-II renovation work. The petitioner's technical bid was rejected for failing to submit a bank solvency certificate and lacking the minimum ₹5 Crore average annual turnover requirement, while another bidder was declared L-1. The case has been adjourned to 04.05.2026 for further hearing, and the petitioner is directed to serve notices on all respondents within two working days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/1893/2026
Summary: The Gauhati High Court issued notice on a writ petition filed by Ramesh Saikia challenging a tender process conducted by the Mariani Municipal Board for Zone-II renovation work. The petitioner's technical bid was rejected for failing to submit a bank solvency certificate and lacking the minimum ₹5 Crore average annual turnover requirement, while another bidder was declared L-1. The case has been adjourned to 04.05.2026 for further hearing, and the petitioner is directed to serve notices on all respondents within two working days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts