RAMESH SAIKIA vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS Advocate - GA, ASSAM — WP(C) /1893/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.

CNR: GAHC010065162026

Next Hearing

04th May 2026

e-Filing Number

26-03-2026

Filing Number

WP(C) /3688/2026

Filing Date

26-03-2026

Registration No

WP(C) /1893/2026

Registration Date

30-03-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

Coram

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10180 - Award of contracts by the State or its instrumentalities ( 172 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Acts & Sections

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Section 226

Petitioner(s)

RAMESH SAIKIA

Adv. MR. A DEKA,R DEB,R DEB, ,MR. S BORTHAKUR,MS. S KAKATI,R DEB

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS Advocate - GA (Government Advocate), ASSAM

THE DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION

THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER, JORHAT

THE CO-DISTRICT COMMISSIONER

MARIANI MUNICIPAL BOARD

THE CHAIRPERSON

THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER

UTPAL GOGOI

LAKHYAJIT GOGOI

Hearing History

Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

04-05-2026

MOTION

Orders

01-04-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

Summary: The Gauhati High Court issued notice on a writ petition filed by Ramesh Saikia challenging a tender process conducted by the Mariani Municipal Board for Zone-II renovation work. The petitioner's technical bid was rejected for failing to submit a bank solvency certificate and lacking the minimum ₹5 Crore average annual turnover requirement, while another bidder was declared L-1. The case has been adjourned to 04.05.2026 for further hearing, and the petitioner is directed to serve notices on all respondents within two working days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Gauhati High Court issued notice on a writ petition filed by Ramesh Saikia challenging a tender process conducted by the Mariani Municipal Board for Zone-II renovation work. The petitioner's technical bid was rejected for failing to submit a bank solvency certificate and lacking the minimum ₹5 Crore average annual turnover requirement, while another bidder was declared L-1. The case has been adjourned to 04.05.2026 for further hearing, and the petitioner is directed to serve notices on all respondents within two working days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case