PRANABJYOTI BARMAN vs ICICI BANK LIMITED AND OTHRS Advocate - DY.S.G.I. — WP(C)/1882/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010064942026

e-Filing Number

26-03-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/3674/2026

Filing Date

26-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/1882/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis Baruah

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis Baruah

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10189 - Other Civil Rules relating to other Writ Petitions. ( 247 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 01-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRANABJYOTI BARMAN

    Adv. MR. P J BARMAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ICICI BANK LIMITED AND OTHRS Advocate - DY.S.G.I.

  2. 2.ICICI BANK LIMITED

  3. 3.THE UNION OF INDIA

  4. 4.INDIAN CYBER CRIME

  5. 5.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

  6. 6.THE OFFICER IN CHARGE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis BaruahView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Gauhati High Court directed ICICI Bank to defreeze the petitioner's savings account that had been frozen for over 1.5 years due to suspected cybercrime proceeds of Rs. 10,600.26. While allowing the petitioner to operate the account, the court kept the disputed amount under lien, subject to further instructions from law enforcement and cyber authorities, balancing the petitioner's banking rights with cybercrime investigation requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/1882/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Gauhati High Court directed ICICI Bank to defreeze the petitioner's savings account that had been frozen for over 1.5 years due to suspected cybercrime proceeds of Rs. 10,600.26. While allowing the petitioner to operate the account, the court kept the disputed amount under lien, subject to further instructions from law enforcement and cyber authorities, balancing the petitioner's banking rights with cybercrime investigation requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case