MRS MEERA SAIKIA vs INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Advocate - SC, IITG — I.A.(Civil) /1027/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 01st April 2026.

CNR: GAHC010064852026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

26-03-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil) /3670/2026

Filing Date

26-03-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil) /1027/2026

Registration Date

26-03-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA

Coram

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Acts & Sections

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Section 227

Petitioner(s)

MRS MEERA SAIKIA

Adv. MR. R B PHOOKAN,MS D DAS,MS D DAS, ,MS D DAS

Respondent(s)

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Advocate - SC, IITG

ON THE DEATH OF KRISHNA CHANDRA BARUAH HIS LEGAL HEIRS

SMT TANUJA BARUAH

SRI HRIDOYJIT BARUAH

SRI RATUL BARUAH

SRI MUKUT BARUAH

SRI SAURAV BARUAH

THE COLLECTOR OF KAMRUP

Orders

01-04-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA

The Gauhati High Court allowed an interlocutory application seeking rectification of a typographical error in a previous order dated 20.03.2026. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita corrected the erroneous date of 28.02.2026 to the correct date of 20.02.2026, which was when I.A.(Civil)/3026/2025 was actually disposed of by a co-ordinate bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Gauhati High Court allowed an interlocutory application seeking rectification of a typographical error in a previous order dated 20.03.2026. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita corrected the erroneous date of 28.02.2026 to the correct date of 20.02.2026, which was when I.A.(Civil)/3026/2025 was actually disposed of by a co-ordinate bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case