DEBEN DOIMARY AND ANR vs THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND 2 ORS. Advocate - MR SISHIR DUTTA, ,MS M BORCHETIYA,MR S DUTTA,MR. S DUTTA — I.A.(Civil)/1044/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section SEC. 173. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010064652026

e-Filing Number

25-03-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/3655/2026

Filing Date

26-Mar-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/1044/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section SEC. 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEBEN DOIMARY AND ANR

    Adv. MR. P HAZARIKA, ,MR. H S BORAH

  2. 2.SMT. REEMALI DAIMARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND 2 ORS. Advocate - MR SISHIR DUTTA, ,MS M BORCHETIYA,MR S DUTTA,MR. S DUTTA

  2. 2.ARUN DAS

  3. 3.PRAKASH KALITA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar KalitaView PDF

    Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/1044/2026 The Gauhati High Court allowed the petitioners (claimants in MAC Appeal No. 17/2020) to withdraw Rs. 1,60,000 deposited by New India Assurance Company Limited before the court registry. The insurance company did not oppose the withdrawal application, and the court granted permission for the applicants to withdraw the amount after proper verification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/1044/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/1044/2026 The Gauhati High Court allowed the petitioners (claimants in MAC Appeal No. 17/2020) to withdraw Rs. 1,60,000 deposited by New India Assurance Company Limited before the court registry. The insurance company did not oppose the withdrawal application, and the court granted permission for the applicants to withdraw the amount after proper verification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case