SUSHIL RANJAN DEY vs BHAGWATI DEVI KHEMANI Advocate - MR B KAUSHIK, ,MR S SARMAH,MR. S HAZARIKA — I.A.(Civil)/1239/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Status: Orders. Next hearing: : -.

Orders Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010064442026

e-Filing Number

25-03-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/3645/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/1239/2026

Registration Date

21-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUSHIL RANJAN DEY

    Adv. MR. P J SAIKIA, ,MR. A K GUPTA,MR K J SAIKIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHAGWATI DEVI KHEMANI Advocate - MR B KAUSHIK, ,MR S SARMAH,MR. S HAZARIKA

  2. 2.SRI LAKHI PRASAD KHEMANI

  3. 3.SRI RAMESH KUMAR KHEMANI

  4. 4.ON THE DEATH OF SRI SURENDRA KUMAR KHEMANI4.

  5. 5.SMTI ANITA DEVI4.

  6. 6.SRI SIDDHARTH KHEMANI

  7. 7.SRI NARENDRA KUMAR KHEMANI

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-May-2026

    Orders

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik Goswami

  3. 08-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik GoswamiView PDF

    Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/1239/2026 Petitioner: Sushil Ranjan Dey Respondents: Bhagwati Devi Khemani and others Order Date: 08.05.2026 Outcome: The matter was adjourned and re-listed for 29.05.2026. Justice Kaushik Goswami granted the adjournment as requested by the petitioner's counsel (Mr. K. J. Saikia), with no opposition from the respondent's side. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/1239/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/1239/2026 Petitioner: Sushil Ranjan Dey Respondents: Bhagwati Devi Khemani and others Order Date: 08.05.2026 Outcome: The matter was adjourned and re-listed for 29.05.2026. Justice Kaushik Goswami granted the adjournment as requested by the petitioner's counsel (Mr. K. J. Saikia), with no opposition from the respondent's side. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case