SABNAM NASRIN CHOUDHURY vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Advocate - DY.S.G.I., ,SC, HIGHER EDU,MR. M H LASKAR,MR. S ROY — I.A.(Civil)/1895/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010059632026

e-Filing Number

19-03-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/3375/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/1895/2026

Registration Date

05-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SABNAM NASRIN CHOUDHURY

    Adv. MR. K A MAZUMDER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Advocate - DY.S.G.I., ,SC, HIGHER EDU,MR. M H LASKAR,MR. S ROY

  2. 2.THE STATE OF ASSAM

  3. 3.THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION

  4. 4.THE PRINCIPAL,

  5. 5.PRESIDENT,

  6. 6.PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR AND HEAD

  7. 7.MR BIJOY SINHA,

  8. 8.DR. GULZAR HUSSAIN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan NairView PDF

    Case Summary: Sabnam Nasrin Choudhury v. Union of India The Gauhati High Court closed the interlocutory application (I.A. Civil/1895/2026) on 15-06-2026, finding no further orders were necessary. The court's decision was based on an order passed the same day in the related writ petition W.P.(C) No. 163/2026, which effectively superseded the need for relief in this interlocutory application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/1895/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sabnam Nasrin Choudhury v. Union of India The Gauhati High Court closed the interlocutory application (I.A. Civil/1895/2026) on 15-06-2026, finding no further orders were necessary. The court's decision was based on an order passed the same day in the related writ petition W.P.(C) No. 163/2026, which effectively superseded the need for relief in this interlocutory application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case