HELAL UDDIN ALIAS KAMRUL ISLAM vs THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP, ASSAM — Crl.Pet./443/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010059402026

e-Filing Number

18-03-2026

Filing Number

Crl.Pet./2577/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

Crl.Pet./443/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10263 - Criminal Revisions for quashing of criminal proceeding ( 221 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HELAL UDDIN ALIAS KAMRUL ISLAM

    Adv. MR. S C BISWAS,MS. K L R YANTHAN,MS. K L R YANTHAN, ,MS. S. CHANDA,MS. J GHOSH,MS. U NANDA,MS. K L R YANTHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor), ASSAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti SaikiaView PDF

    Summary The Gauhati High Court allowed Helal Uddin's criminal petition, set aside the non-bailable warrant of arrest issued by the trial court for his non-appearance, and granted him bail. The court found that since the petitioner expressed willingness to face trial, he deserved an opportunity to do so; he was directed to appear before the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate within 10 days and would be released on bail of Rs. 25,000 with a surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.Pet./443/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Gauhati High Court allowed Helal Uddin's criminal petition, set aside the non-bailable warrant of arrest issued by the trial court for his non-appearance, and granted him bail. The court found that since the petitioner expressed willingness to face trial, he deserved an opportunity to do so; he was directed to appear before the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate within 10 days and would be released on bail of Rs. 25,000 with a surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case