SMT KALPANA DAS vs BISWA BIJOY DAS AND 2 ORS. — I.A.(Civil)/1109/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER 41, RULE 5, SEC. 151. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Next hearing 11-Jun-2026

CNR: GAHC010059352026

e-Filing Number

18-03-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/3359/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/1109/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER 41, RULE 5, SEC. 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT KALPANA DAS

    Adv. MR. S P ROY, ,MS. K G SHARMA,JYOTISH DAS,MR.T YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BISWA BIJOY DAS AND 2 ORS.

  2. 2.BISWA JYOTI DAS

  3. 3.SMT ARPANA DAS

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    For Hearing U/O XLI Rule II C.P.C.

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik Goswami

  3. 07-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik GoswamiView PDF

    Summary of I.A.(Civil)/1109/2026 The Gauhati High Court admitted a second appeal by SMT KALPANA DAS challenging a December 9, 2025 judgment from the Civil Judge, Dibrugarh. The court issued notice returnable by June 11, 2026, and suspended the operation of the impugned judgment until the returnable date to prevent irreparable harm to the appellant who claims possession of the disputed land. The appellant was directed to serve notice on respondents by speed post within three working days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/1109/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of I.A.(Civil)/1109/2026 The Gauhati High Court admitted a second appeal by SMT KALPANA DAS challenging a December 9, 2025 judgment from the Civil Judge, Dibrugarh. The court issued notice returnable by June 11, 2026, and suspended the operation of the impugned judgment until the returnable date to prevent irreparable harm to the appellant who claims possession of the disputed land. The appellant was directed to serve notice on respondents by speed post within three working days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case