MRS BONTI DEURI vs UNION OF INDIA Advocate - GA, ASSAM, ,DY.S.G.I.,MR. A K DUTTA,MR. K GOGOI — I.A.(Civil)/926/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010058872026

e-Filing Number

18-03-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/3325/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/926/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MRS BONTI DEURI

    Adv. MR. A K SARMA, ,MR D KALITA,MR H J TAMULI

  2. 2.B MANGJKAIM AIMOL

    Adv. MR DIPANGKAR KALITA

  3. 3.MRS GEETA MALAKAR ALIAS GITA MALAKAR

    Adv. MR DIPANGKAR KALITA

  4. 4.SUREYA AHMED

    Adv. MR DIPANGKAR KALITA

  5. 5.MRS ESTHER GEORGE

    Adv. MR DIPANGKAR KALITA

  6. 6.SUJOY DAS CHOUDHURY

    Adv. MR DIPANGKAR KALITA

  7. 7.MRS SEWALI KALITA

    Adv. MR DIPANGKAR KALITA

  8. 8.MRS MANJUMA HAZARIKA

    Adv. MR DIPANGKAR KALITA

  9. 9.MRS TILLOTTAMA BRAHMA

    Adv. MR DIPANGKAR KALITA

  10. 10.KEISAM REENA DEVI

    Adv. MR DIPANGKAR KALITA

  11. 11.MRS PURNIMA NARZARY

    Adv. MR DIPANGKAR KALITA

  12. 12.MRS PUSPALATA DEVI

    Adv. MR DIPANGKAR KALITA

  13. 13.MRS KHOMA DEVI SARKI

    Adv. MR DIPANGKAR KALITA

  14. 14.MRS RINTUMONI PATIR,

    Adv. MR DIPANGKAR KALITA

  15. 15.MRS SUSHILA DEVI THAKUR

    Adv. MR DIPANGKAR KALITA

  16. 16.MANALISHA ANDREW

    Adv. MR DIPANGKAR KALITA

  17. 17.MRS JUNU DOLEY

    Adv. MR DIPANGKAR KALITA

  18. 18.MRS AHEMA HAJONG

    Adv. MR DIPANGKAR KALITA

  19. 19.MR MANTU BARMAN

    Adv. MR DIPANGKAR KALITA

  20. 20.MR DHARMEN NAIDU

    Adv. MR DIPANGKAR KALITA

  21. 21.MEGHALI MECH

    Adv. MR DIPANGKAR KALITA

  22. 22.MRS BIYOLA BARUAH

    Adv. MR DIPANGKAR KALITA

  23. 23.MRS MITALI CHOUDHURY

    Adv. MR DIPANGKAR KALITA

  24. 24.MRS CHITRALEKHA BORO

    Adv. MR DIPANGKAR KALITA

  25. 25.MRS SHILPI DEURI

    Adv. MR DIPANGKAR KALITA

  26. 26.MRS GEETA DEKA ALIAS GITA DEKA

    Adv. MR DIPANGKAR KALITA

  27. 27.MRS GEDAK YOMCHA

    Adv. MR DIPANGKAR KALITA

  28. 28.MRS HUTEN SANDELA ANAL

    Adv. MR DIPANGKAR KALITA

  29. 29.NABAJYOTI DEKA,

    Adv. MR DIPANGKAR KALITA

  30. 30.MRS NEELIMA BURAGOHAIN

    Adv. MR DIPANGKAR KALITA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA Advocate - GA (Government Advocate), ASSAM, ,DY.S.G.I.,MR. A K DUTTA,MR. K GOGOI

  2. 2.THE LOKOPRIYA GOPINATH BORDOLOI REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH

  3. 3.THE GOVT OF ASSAM

  4. 4.THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY The Gauhati High Court allowed an interlocutory application filed by 30 healthcare workers (ward sisters, staff nurses, pharmacist, and radiographer) employed at Lokopriya Gopinath Bordoloi Regional Institute of Mental Health, Tezpur, seeking inclusion of the North Eastern Council (NEC), Shilling and the Principal Accountant General, Assam as necessary parties in their accompanying writ petition. The petitioners sought these additions because their underlying claim in WP(C) No.2591/2025 concerns inclusion of their names under the old pension scheme, making these entities necessary parties to the proceedings. The court granted the application without opposition from respondents' counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/926/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY The Gauhati High Court allowed an interlocutory application filed by 30 healthcare workers (ward sisters, staff nurses, pharmacist, and radiographer) employed at Lokopriya Gopinath Bordoloi Regional Institute of Mental Health, Tezpur, seeking inclusion of the North Eastern Council (NEC), Shilling and the Principal Accountant General, Assam as necessary parties in their accompanying writ petition. The petitioners sought these additions because their underlying claim in WP(C) No.2591/2025 concerns inclusion of their names under the old pension scheme, making these entities necessary parties to the proceedings. The court granted the application without opposition from respondents' counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case