SPS CONSTRUCTION INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED vs UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS. Advocate - DY.S.G.I., ,MS M KAKOTY,R SARMAH,MR. K GOGOI — WA /79/2026
Case under Gauhati High Court Rules Section CHAPTER VA, RULE 2(2). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 01st April 2026.
CNR: GAHC010057962026
e-Filing Number
17-03-2026
Filing Number
WA /3264/2026
Filing Date
17-03-2026
Registration No
WA /79/2026
Registration Date
19-03-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Coram
HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
10237 - Writ Appeals under the Gauhati High Court Rules. ( 204 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SPS CONSTRUCTION INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
Adv. MR. M P SARMA,MR A CHAKRABORTY,MR A CHAKRABORTY, ,MS S SARMA HAZARIKA,MS H.K. SUMI,MR A CHAKRABORTY
Respondent(s)
UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS. Advocate - DY.S.G.I., ,MS M KAKOTY,R SARMAH,MR. K GOGOI
NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY
LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
- FOR FRESH ADMISSION WITH STAY/BAIL -
- FOR FRESH ADMISSION WITH STAY/BAIL -
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | - FOR FRESH ADMISSION WITH STAY/BAIL - | |
| 31-03-2026 | - FOR FRESH ADMISSION WITH STAY/BAIL - |
Orders
Summary: The Gauhati High Court upheld the validity of an eligibility clause in a railway bridge tender requiring bidders to have no history of structural collapse attributable to design or quality failure in the past three years. The court rejected SPS Construction's challenge, holding that the clause is not vague or arbitrary but a legitimate risk mitigation measure, and that the absence of prior judicial adjudication does not render it unworkable—bidders must disclose collapse incidents and explain they weren't caused by design/quality failures. The court dismissed the appeal, affirming that tender authorities have wide discretion in setting eligibility criteria, and this condition applies only to the specific tender, not constituting blacklisting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Gauhati High Court upheld the validity of an eligibility clause in a railway bridge tender requiring bidders to have no history of structural collapse attributable to design or quality failure in the past three years. The court rejected SPS Construction's challenge, holding that the clause is not vague or arbitrary but a legitimate risk mitigation measure, and that the absence of prior judicial adjudication does not render it unworkable—bidders must disclose collapse incidents and explain they weren't caused by design/quality failures. The court dismissed the appeal, affirming that tender authorities have wide discretion in setting eligibility criteria, and this condition applies only to the specific tender, not constituting blacklisting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts