NAYAN KALITA @ NAYAN MONI KALITA vs MAGMA HDI GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND 2 ORS. Advocate - MR. R GOSWAMI, ,MS. M SAIKIA — I.A.(Civil)/970/2026
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section SEC. 5. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 08th May 2026.
CNR: GAHC010054412026
e-Filing Number
13-03-2026
Filing Number
I.A.(Civil)/3066/2026
Filing Date
13-Mar-2026
Registration No
I.A.(Civil)/970/2026
Registration Date
23-Mar-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NAYAN KALITA @ NAYAN MONI KALITA
Adv. MR. A R AGARWALA,MD. K ALI,MD. K ALI, ,MR ADITYA AGARWALA,MS. R LAILA,MD. K ALI
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAGMA HDI GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND 2 ORS. Advocate - MR. R GOSWAMI, ,MS. M SAIKIA
-
2.NOBIR HUSSAIN
-
3.MONOWAR HUSSAIN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar KalitaView PDF
Case Summary: The Gauhati High Court allowed Nayan Kalita's interlocutory application seeking condonation of a 14-day delay in filing an appeal against a MACT judgment and award dated 20.11.2025 in a motor accident claim case. The Court found sufficient cause for the delay based on grounds stated in paragraphs 3-5 of the application, and the respondent insurance company did not object. The Court directed the Registry to register the connected MAC Appeal and list it for admission after one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Orders
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita
-
27-Mar-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar KalitaView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/970/2026
Case Summary: The Gauhati High Court allowed Nayan Kalita's interlocutory application seeking condonation of a 14-day delay in filing an appeal against a MACT judgment and award dated 20.11.2025 in a motor accident claim case. The Court found sufficient cause for the delay based on grounds stated in paragraphs 3-5 of the application, and the respondent insurance company did not object. The Court directed the Registry to register the connected MAC Appeal and list it for admission after one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts