MARJINA KHATOON vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS. Advocate - SR GA,ASSAM — WP(C)/1767/2019

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010054262019

Filing Number

WP(C)/3388/2019

Filing Date

11-Mar-2019

Registration No

WP(C)/1767/2019

Registration Date

14-Mar-2019

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair

Category

10023 - Selection and appointment with respect to State Govt Employees. ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 01-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MARJINA KHATOON

    Adv. MR. A K SARMA,MR H J TAMULI,MR H J TAMULI, ,MR H J TAMULI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS. Advocate - SR GA,ASSAM

  2. 2.THE DIRECTOR, SOCIAL WELFARE, ASSAM

  3. 3.THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan NairView PDF

    The Gauhati High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Marjina Khatoon against the State of Assam and others for non-prosecution. The petitioner failed to appear or be represented on multiple hearing dates, leading the court to presume the petitioner did not wish to pursue the petition further. Consequently, the petition was dismissed and all interim orders previously passed were vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jan-2021

    Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF

  4. 18-Mar-2019

    Honourable Mr. Justice Michael ZothankhumaView PDF

  5. 11-Mar-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/1767/2019

casestatus.in Summary

The Gauhati High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Marjina Khatoon against the State of Assam and others for non-prosecution. The petitioner failed to appear or be represented on multiple hearing dates, leading the court to presume the petitioner did not wish to pursue the petition further. Consequently, the petition was dismissed and all interim orders previously passed were vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case