MD SAFIQUL ISLAM vs THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP, ASSAM — AB/594/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010054002026

e-Filing Number

12-03-2026

Filing Number

AB/2363/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

AB/594/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10267 - Anticipatory bail Application ( 309 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD SAFIQUL ISLAM

    Adv. MR. M K NEOG

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor), ASSAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar KalitaView PDF

    Case Summary: AB/594/2026 The Gauhati High Court rejected MD Safiqul Islam's anticipatory bail plea in a rape case filed by his daughter-in-law, who alleged he sexually assaulted her on July 5, 2024. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita found sufficient incriminating materials indicating the petitioner's complicity and noted the victim faced threats not to disclose the incident, making bail inappropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Motion (Ab)

    Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar KalitaView PDF

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. AB/594/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: AB/594/2026 The Gauhati High Court rejected MD Safiqul Islam's anticipatory bail plea in a rape case filed by his daughter-in-law, who alleged he sexually assaulted her on July 5, 2024. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita found sufficient incriminating materials indicating the petitioner's complicity and noted the victim faced threats not to disclose the incident, making bail inappropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case