SANTOSH SINGH AND 3 ORS vs GANGA SAGAR SINGH AND 10 ORS — CRP(IO) /92/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SEC. 115. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 27th March 2026.
CNR: GAHC010050732026
e-Filing Number
10-03-2026
Filing Number
CRP(IO) /2852/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
CRP(IO) /92/2026
Registration Date
19-03-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Coram
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10246 - Other Civil Revisions. ( 211 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANTOSH SINGH AND 3 ORS
Adv. PETITIONER IN PERSON
MANJU SINGH
JYOTI SINGH
NIVA SINGH
Respondent(s)
GANGA SAGAR SINGH AND 10 ORS
BIRENDRA SINGH
RAJENDRA SINGH4.
RITA SINGH4.
RAJU SINGH @ BISAL KR. SINGH
CHAMPA SINGH
SANTI SINGH
MOHAN BHUYAN
HARUA BHUYAN @ HARUA BHUMIJ
DEO RAM BHUYAN10.
HEMRAJ BHUYAN10.
MAINA BHUYAN
HIRALAL MOZUMDER
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
MOTION
MOTION
MOTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | MOTION | |
| 26-03-2026 | MOTION | |
| 26-03-2026 | MOTION |
Orders
The Gauhati High Court disposed of a petition seeking expeditious disposal of two title suits (No. 50/2015 and 23/2016) pending in the trial court since 2015-2016. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund acknowledged the delay and directed the Civil Judge, Hojai to make every endeavor to dispose of both suits expeditiously, recognizing that the petitioner-plaintiff was suffering due to court procrastination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Gauhati High Court disposed of a petition seeking expeditious disposal of two title suits (No. 50/2015 and 23/2016) pending in the trial court since 2015-2016. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund acknowledged the delay and directed the Civil Judge, Hojai to make every endeavor to dispose of both suits expeditiously, recognizing that the petitioner-plaintiff was suffering due to court procrastination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts