M/S NIRMAL SEEDS PVT LTD vs MS ARUNA RAJORIA, IAS AND ANR — Cont.Cas(C)/193/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section ART. 215. Status: Orders. Next hearing: : -.

Orders Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010048652026

e-Filing Number

07-03-2026

Filing Number

Cont.Cas(C)/2748/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

Cont.Cas(C)/193/2026

Registration Date

01-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10200 - Contempt Petition (Civil). ( 178 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section ART. 215
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section SEC. 11, SEC. 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S NIRMAL SEEDS PVT LTD

    Adv. MS. M BORAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MS ARUNA RAJORIA, IAS AND ANR

  2. 2.MS MOUSUMI HAZARIKA BHUYAN

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Manish ChoudhuryView PDF

    Case Summary: In Cont.Cas(C)/193/2026 before the Gauhati High Court, M/S Nirmal Seeds Pvt Ltd filed a petition against Ms Aruna Rajoria, IAS (Commissioner, Agriculture Department) and Ms Mousumi Hazarika Bhuyan (District Agricultural Officer). On 20.05.2026, the court found the petitioner's counsel absent and noted that proper service of notice on respondents had not been completed as previously ordered. The court adjourned the case, granting the petitioner three working days to serve notice on respondents via speed post, with the case to be relisted after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-May-2026

    Motion

    Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Manish ChoudhuryView PDF

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cont.Cas(C)/193/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Cont.Cas(C)/193/2026 before the Gauhati High Court, M/S Nirmal Seeds Pvt Ltd filed a petition against Ms Aruna Rajoria, IAS (Commissioner, Agriculture Department) and Ms Mousumi Hazarika Bhuyan (District Agricultural Officer). On 20.05.2026, the court found the petitioner's counsel absent and noted that proper service of notice on respondents had not been completed as previously ordered. The court adjourned the case, granting the petitioner three working days to serve notice on respondents via speed post, with the case to be relisted after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case