NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED vs SMT BHARATI KALITA Advocate - GA, ASSAM, ,MR. S P CHOUDHURY,SC, NHIDC,SC, REVENUE — I.A.(Civil)/750/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010041862026

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/2377/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/750/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Judge

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr. Justice Arun Dev Choudhury

Coram

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr. Justice Arun Dev Choudhury

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED

    Adv. MR C BARUAH

  2. 2.DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER(P)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT BHARATI KALITA Advocate - GA (Government Advocate), ASSAM, ,MR. S P CHOUDHURY,SC, NHIDC,SC, REVENUE

  2. 2.SRI MONOJ KALITA

  3. 3.SRI PANKAJ KALITA

  4. 4.SRI MIKUL KALITA

  5. 5.THE STATE OF ASSAM

  6. 6.THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER

  7. 7.THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER

  8. 8.THE CIRCLE OFFICER

  9. 9.SRI PRANAB KALITA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-May-2026

    Honourable The Chief Justice,honourable Mr. Justice Arun Dev ChoudhuryView PDF

    The Gauhati High Court allowed the appeal of Bharati Kalita and others against a single judge's dismissal, holding that the Additional District Commissioner erred by rejecting their compensation claim instead of referring the dispute over apportionment of land acquisition compensation to the Principal Civil Court under Section 3H(4) of the National Highways Act, 1956. The court set aside both orders and directed the competent authority to refer the matter to the appropriate civil court within four weeks upon the appellants resubmitting their objection regarding compensation shares. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Honourable The Chief Justice,honourable Mr. Justice Arun Dev ChoudhuryView PDF

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/750/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Gauhati High Court allowed the appeal of Bharati Kalita and others against a single judge's dismissal, holding that the Additional District Commissioner erred by rejecting their compensation claim instead of referring the dispute over apportionment of land acquisition compensation to the Principal Civil Court under Section 3H(4) of the National Highways Act, 1956. The court set aside both orders and directed the competent authority to refer the matter to the appropriate civil court within four weeks upon the appellants resubmitting their objection regarding compensation shares. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case