AMAR GUPTA vs THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP, ASSAM — AB/516/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010040482026

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

AB/1754/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

AB/516/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Rajesh Mazumdar

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Rajesh Mazumdar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10267 - Anticipatory bail Application ( 309 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMAR GUPTA

    Adv. J U AHMED,MR. R K MUSHAHARY,MR. R K MUSHAHARY, ,MR. N K MURRY,MR. R K MUSHAHARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor), ASSAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Rajesh MazumdarView PDF

    The Gauhati High Court rejected Amar Gupta's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving illegal cattle transportation. The court found that the case diary revealed allegations of transporting cattle in inhumane conditions with fake transport permits and purchase receipts, with the petitioner being the vehicle driver who evaded arrest during a road traffic accident. The court determined these serious allegations warranted denial of anticipatory bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Bail Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti SaikiaView PDF

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. AB/516/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Gauhati High Court rejected Amar Gupta's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving illegal cattle transportation. The court found that the case diary revealed allegations of transporting cattle in inhumane conditions with fake transport permits and purchase receipts, with the petitioner being the vehicle driver who evaded arrest during a road traffic accident. The court determined these serious allegations warranted denial of anticipatory bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case