RANA GOSWAMI vs THE DIBRUGARH UNIVERSITY AND 3 ORS. Advocate - MR. K GOGOI, ,MR. K GOGOI — CRP/37/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section ART. 227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 23rd April 2026.
CNR: GAHC010039542026
e-Filing Number
24-02-2026
Filing Number
CRP/2245/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
CRP/37/2026
Registration Date
17-Mar-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10244 - Civil Revision under Article 227 of the Constitution. ( 209 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
23-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 01-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RANA GOSWAMI
Adv. MR. D BARUAH,MR. P K BORDOLOI,MR. P K BORDOLOI, ,MS. P HANDIQUE,MR. P K BORDOLOI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE DIBRUGARH UNIVERSITY AND 3 ORS. Advocate - MR. K GOGOI, ,MR. K GOGOI
-
2.THE REGISTRAR, DIBRUGARH UNIVERSITY
-
3.THE CONTROLIER OF EXAMINATIONS, DIBRUGARH UNIVERSITY
-
4.JAGANNATH BAROOAH COLLEGE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF
The Gauhati High Court set aside the trial court's order rejecting the plaintiff's petition to issue a notice for admission of facts under CPC Order 12 Rule 4, directing the trial court to properly dispose of the respondent university's counter-petition and proceed with the suit. The court found the trial court erred by abandoning this procedural stage solely on grounds of delay without considering pending petitions or the university's failure to respond to the admission notice within prescribed timeframes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF
-
01-Apr-2026
Motion
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan
-
30-Mar-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF
-
30-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Mar-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik GoswamiView PDF
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRP/37/2026
The Gauhati High Court set aside the trial court's order rejecting the plaintiff's petition to issue a notice for admission of facts under CPC Order 12 Rule 4, directing the trial court to properly dispose of the respondent university's counter-petition and proceed with the suit. The court found the trial court erred by abandoning this procedural stage solely on grounds of delay without considering pending petitions or the university's failure to respond to the admission notice within prescribed timeframes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts