PRADIP CHANDRA BORAH vs PABITRA RAM KHOUND Advocate - MR R M DAS, ,D JAIN,MR. C SHARMA,MS. R DEKA — Cont.Cas(C)/104/2025
Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 12. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GAHC010038832025
e-Filing Number
20-02-2025
Filing Number
Cont.Cas(C)/2285/2025
Filing Date
21-Feb-2025
Registration No
Cont.Cas(C)/104/2025
Registration Date
25-Feb-2025
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10200 - Contempt Petition (Civil). ( 178 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRADIP CHANDRA BORAH
Adv. MS. B CHOWDHURY
Respondent(s)
-
1.PABITRA RAM KHOUND Advocate - MR R M DAS, ,D JAIN,MR. C SHARMA,MS. R DEKA
-
2.BHASKAR JYOTI SARMA
-
3.PRANAB BORAH
-
4.DEBA PRASAD BORAH
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
30-May-2026
Orders
Honourable Mr. Justice Arun Dev Choudhury
-
20-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF
Case Summary: Cont.Cas(C)/104/2025 Pradip Chandra Borah v. Pabitra Ram Khound & Others The Gauhati High Court, before Justice Soumitra Saikia, heard a contempt case regarding reconstruction of the petitioner's service book. Due to unavailability of necessary records from both the petitioner and respondents, the court permitted the petitioner's counsel to obtain fresh instructions and gather any available service-related documents. The case was adjourned for four weeks to facilitate reconstruction efforts in compliance with the earlier order dated 14.05.2024 in W.P(C) No. 485/2014. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Arun Dev ChoudhuryView PDF
-
28-Feb-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Suman ShyamView PDF
-
21-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. Cont.Cas(C)/104/2025
Case Summary: Cont.Cas(C)/104/2025 Pradip Chandra Borah v. Pabitra Ram Khound & Others The Gauhati High Court, before Justice Soumitra Saikia, heard a contempt case regarding reconstruction of the petitioner's service book. Due to unavailability of necessary records from both the petitioner and respondents, the court permitted the petitioner's counsel to obtain fresh instructions and gather any available service-related documents. The case was adjourned for four weeks to facilitate reconstruction efforts in compliance with the earlier order dated 14.05.2024 in W.P(C) No. 485/2014. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts