TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs SMT. ANAJALI SAIKIA AND 2 ORS. Advocate - MR. J KALITA, ,MR SOHAING,AMAN ALI — I.A.(Civil) /602/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section SEC. 5. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 01st April 2026.

CNR: GAHC010036452026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

20-02-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil) /2055/2026

Filing Date

20-02-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil) /602/2026

Registration Date

23-02-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA

Coram

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Acts & Sections

LIMITATION ACT, 1963 Section SEC. 5

Petitioner(s)

TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

Adv. MR T KALITA,MR. A KAKATI,MR. A KAKATI, ,MR. A KAKATI

Respondent(s)

SMT. ANAJALI SAIKIA AND 2 ORS. Advocate - MR. J KALITA, ,MR SOHAING,AMAN ALI

DIPANKAR SAIKIA

SAURAV JYOTI GOGOI

Hearing History

Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA

02-04-2026

ORDERS

Orders

27-04-2026
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER

The Gauhati High Court issued a procedural order in an insurance appeal (MACApp./176/2026) between Tata AIG General Insurance Company Limited and the heirs of Late Ranjit Saikia. The court directed the appellant's counsel to furnish a copy of the appeal memo to the respondent's counsel and adjourned the matter to 07.05.2026 for admission hearing, as the respondent had not received the appeal documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Gauhati High Court issued a procedural order in an insurance appeal (MACApp./176/2026) between Tata AIG General Insurance Company Limited and the heirs of Late Ranjit Saikia. The court directed the appellant's counsel to furnish a copy of the appeal memo to the respondent's counsel and adjourned the matter to 07.05.2026 for admission hearing, as the respondent had not received the appeal documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case