THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs MD. RUBUL ALI AND 2 ORS. — I.A.(Civil)/717/2026
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section SEC. 5. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GAHC010033492026
e-Filing Number
17-02-2026
Filing Number
I.A.(Civil)/1876/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
I.A.(Civil)/717/2026
Registration Date
02-Mar-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
Adv. MR. J KALITA
Respondent(s)
-
1.MD. RUBUL ALI AND 2 ORS.
-
2.DILIP KUMAR ROY
-
3.MD. MAIDUL ALI
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: I.A.(Civil)/717/2026 The Gauhati High Court heard Oriental Insurance Company Limited's interim application against MD. Rubul Ali and two others on 08.06.2026. The court noted that notice was successfully served on respondent No. 1, but service upon respondents 2 and 3 remained incomplete as neither acknowledgment cards nor unserved notices were returned by the Registry. The case was adjourned for two weeks pending completion of service upon respondents 2 and 3. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
Orders
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita
-
06-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar KalitaView PDF
-
06-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Mar-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar KalitaView PDF
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/717/2026
CASE SUMMARY: I.A.(Civil)/717/2026 The Gauhati High Court heard Oriental Insurance Company Limited's interim application against MD. Rubul Ali and two others on 08.06.2026. The court noted that notice was successfully served on respondent No. 1, but service upon respondents 2 and 3 remained incomplete as neither acknowledgment cards nor unserved notices were returned by the Registry. The case was adjourned for two weeks pending completion of service upon respondents 2 and 3. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts