THE RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. vs SALEHA BEGUM AND 3 ORS. — I.A.(Civil)/891/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section SEC. 5. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010030802026

e-Filing Number

13-02-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/1715/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/891/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section SEC. 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

    Adv. MR. A J SAIKIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SALEHA BEGUM AND 3 ORS.

  2. 2.TAHIRA BEGUM

  3. 3.GOPAL TALUKDAR

  4. 4.SAMSUL HOQUE

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF

    Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/891/2026 The Gauhati High Court heard Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd.'s interim application against Saleha Begum, Tahira Begum, Gopal Talukdar, and Samsul Hoque. The court deemed service of notice complete for respondents 1 and 2 (who received notices through family members), but service on respondents 3 and 4 remained pending. The case was adjourned for two weeks pending successful service of notice on respondents 3 and 4. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-May-2026

    Orders

    Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita

  4. 05-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar KalitaView PDF

  5. 05-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar KalitaView PDF

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/891/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/891/2026 The Gauhati High Court heard Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd.'s interim application against Saleha Begum, Tahira Begum, Gopal Talukdar, and Samsul Hoque. The court deemed service of notice complete for respondents 1 and 2 (who received notices through family members), but service on respondents 3 and 4 remained pending. The case was adjourned for two weeks pending successful service of notice on respondents 3 and 4. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case