MD OMAR ALI ALIAS AMIR ALI vs THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP, ASSAM — AB/348/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 09th June 2026.
CNR: GAHC010029922026
e-Filing Number
13-02-2026
Filing Number
AB/1335/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
AB/348/2026
Registration Date
17-Feb-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10267 - Anticipatory bail Application ( 309 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
09-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD OMAR ALI ALIAS AMIR ALI
Adv. MR G CHAMUAH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor), ASSAM
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti SaikiaView PDF
The Gauhati High Court allowed MD Omar Ali's bail petition under Section 482 BNSS, 2023 in connection with Bongaigaon P.S. Case No. 18/2026 (a lawyer assault case). The court made absolute the interim bail granted on 19.02.2026, noting the petitioner was not named in the FIR and had cooperated fully with police investigation, thereby not deserving custody detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
Bail Hearing
Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia
-
02-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti SaikiaView PDF
-
02-Jun-2026
Bail Hearing
Honourable Mr. Justice Pranjal Das
-
07-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Pranjal DasView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Feb-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Rajesh MazumdarView PDF
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. AB/348/2026
The Gauhati High Court allowed MD Omar Ali's bail petition under Section 482 BNSS, 2023 in connection with Bongaigaon P.S. Case No. 18/2026 (a lawyer assault case). The court made absolute the interim bail granted on 19.02.2026, noting the petitioner was not named in the FIR and had cooperated fully with police investigation, thereby not deserving custody detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts