SANIWARA BEGUM vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS. Advocate - GA, ASSAM, ,SC, REVENUE — WP(C)/1162/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
CNR: GAHC010028932026
e-Filing Number
12-02-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/1600/2026
Filing Date
12-Feb-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/1162/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis Baruah
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis Baruah
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10160 - Other land matters relating to Land Matters. ( 153 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 01-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANIWARA BEGUM
Adv. K U AHMED,E DEVI,E DEVI, ,S K RAHMATULLAH,E DEVI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS. Advocate - GA (Government Advocate), ASSAM, ,SC, REVENUE
-
2.THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER,
-
3.THE CIRCLE OFFICER,
Case History
-
06-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Admission
Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis Baruah
-
01-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis BaruahView PDF
Summary: The Gauhati High Court adjourned the writ petition (WP(C)/1162/2026) filed by Saniwara Begum against the State of Assam and two others to 06.05.2026. The court noted that State respondents (District Commissioner and Circle Officer) failed to provide instructions to their counsel despite being communicated. The court warned that if instructions are not provided by the next hearing, it will summon the District Commissioner (Respondent No.2) for personal appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar MedhiView PDF
-
12-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/1162/2026
Summary: The Gauhati High Court adjourned the writ petition (WP(C)/1162/2026) filed by Saniwara Begum against the State of Assam and two others to 06.05.2026. The court noted that State respondents (District Commissioner and Circle Officer) failed to provide instructions to their counsel despite being communicated. The court warned that if instructions are not provided by the next hearing, it will summon the District Commissioner (Respondent No.2) for personal appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts