FULBAR ALI AND ANR vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR Advocate - PP, ASSAM, ,MS T PARASHAR — Crl.Pet./223/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 22nd April 2026.
CNR: GAHC010028572026
e-Filing Number
11-02-2026
Filing Number
Crl.Pet./1279/2026
Filing Date
11-Feb-2026
Registration No
Crl.Pet./223/2026
Registration Date
17-Feb-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10263 - Criminal Revisions for quashing of criminal proceeding ( 221 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
22-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 02-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.FULBAR ALI AND ANR
Adv. MR. N J DUTTA,MR N AHMED,MR N AHMED, ,M RAHMAN,MR A BASUMATARY,MR. M M ZAMAN,MR N AHMED
-
2.MANISHA KHATUN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor), ASSAM, ,MS T PARASHAR
-
2.DIPA BORA DUTTA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti SaikiaView PDF
The Gauhati High Court quashed criminal proceedings against Fulbar Ali for child marriage under the POCSO Act and Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, finding no possibility of conviction since the now-20-year-old wife and husband are living peacefully together and she does not seek his punishment. The court held that continuing the proceedings would constitute abuse of process, as the circumstances render conviction impossible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
Orders
Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia
-
01-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti SaikiaView PDF
-
19-Feb-2026
Honourable Mrs. Justice Mitali ThakuriaView PDF
-
11-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.Pet./223/2026
The Gauhati High Court quashed criminal proceedings against Fulbar Ali for child marriage under the POCSO Act and Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, finding no possibility of conviction since the now-20-year-old wife and husband are living peacefully together and she does not seek his punishment. The court held that continuing the proceedings would constitute abuse of process, as the circumstances render conviction impossible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts