ON THE DEATH OF APPELLANT NO.1 MD. HARUN RASID LASKAR vs LEGAL HEIRS OF LATE KHURSED ALI LASKAR , MD. ABDUL LATIF LASKAR Advocate - MR. N H BARBHUIYA, ,MR M HUSSAIN — I.A.(Civil)/482/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER23RULE9. Disposed: --Disposed Of on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010021802026

e-Filing Number

04-02-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/1192/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/482/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik Goswami

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik Goswami

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Of

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER23RULE9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ON THE DEATH OF APPELLANT NO.1 MD. HARUN RASID LASKAR

    Adv. MS. R CHOUDHURY,MS. B. HAZARIKA,MS. B. HAZARIKA, ,MS. B. HAZARIKA1.

  2. 2.JAKIR HUSSAIN LASKAR1.

  3. 3.MOMTAZ BEGUM LASKAR1.

  4. 4.ANOWAR HUSSAIN LASKAR1.

  5. 5.ALTAF HUSSAIN LASKAR1.

  6. 6.NAZMUL HUSSAIN LASKAR

  7. 7.MD. NAJIM UDDIN LASKAR

  8. 8.MD. KUTUB UDDIN LASKAR

  9. 9.MD. SALIM UDDIN LASKAR

  10. 10.MUSSTT. JOYNOB BIBI LASKAR

  11. 11.MUSSTT. ANOWARA BEGUM LASKAR

  12. 12.MUSSTT. SALAHA BEGUM LASKAR

  13. 13.MUSSTT. REJIA BEGUM LASKAR

  14. 14.MUSSTT. LUTFA BEGUM LASKAR

  15. 15.MUSSTT. RAMJUN NEHAR

  16. 16.MUSSTT. ABU PABIYAN

  17. 17.MD. BAHAR UDDIN LASKAR

  18. 18.MUSSTT. ANGURA BEGUM LASKAR

  19. 19.MUSSTT. RUSHNA BEGUM LASKAR

  20. 20.MUSSTT. RUKIYA BEGUM LASKAR

  21. 21.MUSSTT. NAJMA BEGUM LASKAR

  22. 22.MD. NAZRUL ISLAM LASKAR

  23. 23.MD. KHALIL UDDIN LASKAR

  24. 24.MD. SOID AHMED LASKAR

  25. 25.MD. GULE AHMED LASKAR

  26. 26.MUSTT. LATIFUL NESSA LASKAR

  27. 27.MUSTT. SARIFUL NESSA LASKAR

  28. 28.ON THE DEATH OF MD. KUTEE MIA23.

  29. 29.REJIA BEGUM MAZUMDER23.

  30. 30.SAHARUL ISLAM MAZUMDER23.

  31. 31.SAMSUL ISLAM MAZUMDER23.

  32. 32.MORIAM BEGUM LASKAR23.

  33. 33.JAHIRUL ISLAM MAZUMDER

  34. 34.SURIYA BEGUM

  35. 35.SABIR AHMED

  36. 36.KABIR AHMED

  37. 37.SAFINA BEGUM

  38. 38.SOFIYA BEGUM

  39. 39.SALAH AHMED

  40. 40.NOOR AHMED

  41. 41.RUKIYA BEGUM

  42. 42.MD. FATIR ALI

  43. 43.MD. FAKAR UDDIN

  44. 44.MUSSTT. KARIMA BIBI

  45. 45.MUSSTT. HALIMA BIBI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LEGAL HEIRS OF LATE KHURSED ALI LASKAR , MD. ABDUL LATIF LASKAR Advocate - MR. N H BARBHUIYA, ,MR M HUSSAIN

  2. 2.MD. ABDUL WAHED LASKAR

  3. 3.MD. ABDUL MALIK

  4. 4.MUSSTT. FARHANA BIBI @RAHENA BIBI

  5. 5.MUSSTT. FARHAN BIBI

  6. 6.MUSSTT. NEPURJAN BIBI

  7. 7.MUSSTT. SIRAJUN NESSA

  8. 8.MD. IMRUL HUSSAIN

  9. 9.MD. KHADIM HUSSAIN

  10. 10.MUSSTT. SALEMA AKTAR

  11. 11.MUSSTT. SAMIMA AKTAR

  12. 12.LEGAL HEIRS OF LATE MUBARAK ALI , MUSSTT. JARBUL NESSA

  13. 13.MD. JAMAL UDDIN LASKAR

  14. 14.MD. JALAL UDDIN LASKAR

  15. 15.MD. NAIM UDDIN LASKAR

  16. 16.MD. ANAM UDDIN LASKAR

  17. 17.MD. AKRAM UDDIN LASKAR

  18. 18.MUSSTT. BELUN BEGUM

  19. 19.MUSSTT. ANOWARA BEGUM

  20. 20.MUSSTT. JUBEDA BEGUM

  21. 21.MUSSTT. JILIKA BEGUM

  22. 22.MUSSTT. MALLIKA BEGUM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik GoswamiView PDF

    Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/482/2026 The Gauhati High Court set aside the abatement that occurred in connected RSA No. 57/2016 following the death of appellant Md. Kutee Mia during proceedings. The court found sufficient cause for the delay in substituting his five legal heirs on record, determining that the delay was neither deliberate nor mala fide. The applicant was directed to take necessary steps for substitution of the deceased's legal heirs in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Orders

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik Goswami

  4. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/482/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/482/2026 The Gauhati High Court set aside the abatement that occurred in connected RSA No. 57/2016 following the death of appellant Md. Kutee Mia during proceedings. The court found sufficient cause for the delay in substituting his five legal heirs on record, determining that the delay was neither deliberate nor mala fide. The applicant was directed to take necessary steps for substitution of the deceased's legal heirs in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case