THE STATE OF ASSAM vs FARJUL ISLAM — I.A.(Crl.)/145/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: --Disposed Of on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010021702026

e-Filing Number

03-02-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Crl.)/985/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Crl.)/145/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Judge

Honourable Mrs. Justice Mitali Thakuria

Coram

Honourable Mrs. Justice Mitali Thakuria

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10302 - Interlocutory Application (Criminal) ( 383 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Of

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM

    Adv. MR. B SARMA,ADDL PP,ASSAM,ADDL PP,ASSAM, ,ADDL. PP, ASSAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.FARJUL ISLAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Honourable Mrs. Justice Mitali ThakuriaView PDF

    The Gauhati High Court allowed the State of Assam's application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, condoning a delay of 680 days in filing a criminal appeal and leave petition against an acquittal order passed on 24.01.2024 by the Additional Sessions Judge, POCSO, Kamrup (Metro). The court accepted the State's explanation that the delay resulted from necessary official formalities and inter-departmental communications between the police, prosecution director, and public prosecutor, finding no intentional negligence. The Registry was directed to register the appeal accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Orders

    Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar SharmaView PDF

  5. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Crl.)/145/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Gauhati High Court allowed the State of Assam's application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, condoning a delay of 680 days in filing a criminal appeal and leave petition against an acquittal order passed on 24.01.2024 by the Additional Sessions Judge, POCSO, Kamrup (Metro). The court accepted the State's explanation that the delay resulted from necessary official formalities and inter-departmental communications between the police, prosecution director, and public prosecutor, finding no intentional negligence. The Registry was directed to register the appeal accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case