SAIRA SULTANA RAHMAN vs THE ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD Advocate - SC, APDCL — I.A.(Civil)/389/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
CNR: GAHC010021242026
e-Filing Number
04-02-2026
Filing Number
I.A.(Civil)/1158/2026
Filing Date
04-Feb-2026
Registration No
I.A.(Civil)/389/2026
Registration Date
10-Feb-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 02-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAIRA SULTANA RAHMAN
Adv. MS U SHARMA, ,MR. N SARMA,S DAS
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD Advocate - SC, APDCL
-
2.THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD.
-
3.THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, HRA, APDCL
-
4.THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (D), ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD., LAR
-
5.THE HEADMISTRESS, ASEB L.P. SCHOOL
-
6.THE SUB-DIVISION ENGINEER, FATASHIL ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION
-
7.AJIT SARMA
-
8.JITEN MEDHI
-
9.MD. SAHAM ALI
-
10.JITENDRA NATH KONWAR
Case History
-
08-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Apr-2026
Orders
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
-
01-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
Case Summary Case Adjourned. The Gauhati High Court (I.A. Civil/389/2026) involving Saira Sultana Rahman versus Assam Power Distribution Company Ltd and others was adjourned on 01.04.2026. The court allowed the petitioner's counsel's prayer for adjournment due to difficulties faced by the arguing counsel, and the matters have been listed for hearing after three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Feb-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF
-
04-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/389/2026
Case Summary Case Adjourned. The Gauhati High Court (I.A. Civil/389/2026) involving Saira Sultana Rahman versus Assam Power Distribution Company Ltd and others was adjourned on 01.04.2026. The court allowed the petitioner's counsel's prayer for adjournment due to difficulties faced by the arguing counsel, and the matters have been listed for hearing after three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts