MD. BHIKHU ALI and 4 ORS. vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR Advocate - MR. B K DAS, ,PP, ASSAM,,MR. P THAOSEN — Crl.Rev.P./232/2016

Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Next hearing 23-Jun-2026

CNR: GAHC010020852016

Filing Number

Crl.Rev.P./232/2016

Filing Date

20-Jul-2016

Registration No

Crl.Rev.P./232/2016

Registration Date

25-Jul-2016

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni Kalita

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni Kalita

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10261 - Criminal Revisions against orders passed in trial cases ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD. BHIKHU ALI and 4 ORS.

    Adv. MR. S DUTTA,MR. A DEKA,MR. A DEKA, ,MR J DAS,MR. A DAS,MR. S K MEDHI,MS. NILAKSHI SARMA,MR. S D PURKAYASTHA,MR. N DAS,MR S P DAS,MR. A DEKA

  2. 2.MD. ABUL KALAM

  3. 3.MD. JOYAB ALI

  4. 4.MD. JABED ALI

  5. 5.MD. AFELA ALI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR Advocate - MR. B K DAS, ,PP, ASSAM,,MR. P THAOSEN

  2. 2.SHRI MANTHIR DAS

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Jun-2026

    Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni Kalita

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni Kalita

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik GoswamiView PDF

    Case Summary: Crl.Rev.P./232/2016 The Gauhati High Court adjourned the matter to 08.06.2026 after noting it has been pending since 2016. A stay order remains in effect favoring the petitioners. The court granted time to newly engaged counsel to effectively represent the petitioners. The court warned that any further adjournment requests on the next date would result in the interim order not being extended. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 20-Jul-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.Rev.P./232/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.Rev.P./232/2016 The Gauhati High Court adjourned the matter to 08.06.2026 after noting it has been pending since 2016. A stay order remains in effect favoring the petitioners. The court granted time to newly engaged counsel to effectively represent the petitioners. The court warned that any further adjournment requests on the next date would result in the interim order not being extended. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case