DIPU DEKA vs SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Advocate - MR. A J SAIKIA — I.A.(Civil)/207/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010018152026

e-Filing Number

30-01-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/999/2026

Filing Date

30-Jan-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/207/2026

Registration Date

03-Feb-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik Goswami

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik Goswami

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DIPU DEKA

    Adv. MR. A R AGARWALA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Advocate - MR. A J SAIKIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik GoswamiView PDF

    Case Summary: The Gauhati High Court allowed Dipu Deka's interlocutory application seeking release of Rs. 9,69,661/- (50% of the awarded compensation) deposited by Shriram General Insurance Company before the court registry. The court found that the applicant faced acute financial hardship and urgent need of funds, justifying release of the amount subject to identity verification and completion of requisite formalities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/207/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Gauhati High Court allowed Dipu Deka's interlocutory application seeking release of Rs. 9,69,661/- (50% of the awarded compensation) deposited by Shriram General Insurance Company before the court registry. The court found that the applicant faced acute financial hardship and urgent need of funds, justifying release of the amount subject to identity verification and completion of requisite formalities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case