ON THE DEATH OF ABDUL HAKIM HIS LEGAL HEIRS MD SHAFIK AHMED ALIAS ORS vs ON THE DEATH OF KURSHAD ALI LASKAR HIS LEGAL HEIRS MD ABDUL LATIF LASKAR ALIAS ORS Advocate - MR. N H BARBHUIYA, ,MR. M HUSSAIN — I.A.(Civil)/275/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: --Disposed Of on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010015182026

e-Filing Number

28-01-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/819/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/275/2026

Registration Date

05-Feb-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik Goswami

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik Goswami

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Of

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ON THE DEATH OF ABDUL HAKIM HIS LEGAL HEIRS MD SHAFIK AHMED ALIAS ORS

    Adv. MS. B. HAZARIKA, ,MS. R CHOUDHURY,MR. Z. HUSSAIN

  2. 2.MD. ROFIQUE UDDIN MAZARBHUIYA

  3. 3.MD. AFTARUN NESSA MAZARBHUIYA

  4. 4.MST. RAHANA BEGUM MAZARBHUIYA

  5. 5.MST. RINA BEGUM MAZARBHUIYA

  6. 6.MST. MONWARA BEGUM MAZARBHUIYA

  7. 7.MST. SAJAN BEGUM MAZARBHUIYA

  8. 8.ON THE DEATH OF LATE MD. ABDUL KARIM MAZARBHUIYA8.

  9. 9.SORFUL NESSA LASKAR8.

  10. 10.AMRUL HOQUE MAZARBHUIYA8.

  11. 11.KAMRUL HOQUE MAZARBHUIYA8.

  12. 12.NAZMUL HOQUE MAZARBHUIYA8.

  13. 13.RUSTANA BEGAM LASKAR8.

  14. 14.SALMA BEGUM MAZARBHUIYA8.

  15. 15.RAJMIN SULTANA LASKAR8.

  16. 16.FATIMA BEGOM MAZARBHUIYA

  17. 17.MD. ABDUL AZIM MAZARBHUIYA

  18. 18.MD. ABDUL WAHID MAZARBHUIYA

  19. 19.MD. ABDUL AZIZ MAZARBHUIYA

  20. 20.MST. SAYRA KHATUN MAZARBHUIYA

  21. 21.MST. MANIRA KHATUN MAZARBHUIYA

  22. 22.MST. HAZIRA KHATUN MAZARBHUIYA

  23. 23.MD. JAYNUL HAQUE MAZARBHUIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ON THE DEATH OF KURSHAD ALI LASKAR HIS LEGAL HEIRS MD ABDUL LATIF LASKAR ALIAS ORS Advocate - MR. N H BARBHUIYA, ,MR. M HUSSAIN

  2. 2.MD. ABDUL WAHAB LASKAR

  3. 3.MD. ABDUL MALIK LASKAR

  4. 4.MUSSTT. RAHANA BIBI

  5. 5.MUSSTT. FARHANA BIBI

  6. 6.MUSSTT. NEPURJAN BIBI

  7. 7.MUSSTT. SIRAJUN NESSA

  8. 8.MD. IMRUL HUSSAIN LASKAR

  9. 9.MD. SAJID HUSSAIN LASKAR

  10. 10.MUSSTT. SALINA AKTAR LASKAR

  11. 11.MUSSTT. SAMIMA AKTAR LASKAR

  12. 12.FOIZUL HAQUE MAZARBHUIYA

  13. 13.MD. SALIM UDDIN LASKAR

  14. 14.MD. SIRAJ UDDIN LASKAR

  15. 15.MST. TAIMUN NESSA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik GoswamiView PDF

    Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/275/2026 The Gauhati High Court granted an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, condoning a delay of 1895 days in filing a substitution petition. Appellant No. 8 died on 22.06.2020 during the pendency of RSA No. 56/2016, and his legal heirs were required to be substituted within 90 days (by 20.09.2020), but failed to do so, causing the appeal to abate. The court found the grounds for delay—involving communication delays with counsel and time required to collect details of legal heirs—to be sufficient and bonafide, allowing the substitution application and setting aside the abatement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Orders

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik Goswami

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik GoswamiView PDF

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar SharmaView PDF

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/275/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/275/2026 The Gauhati High Court granted an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, condoning a delay of 1895 days in filing a substitution petition. Appellant No. 8 died on 22.06.2020 during the pendency of RSA No. 56/2016, and his legal heirs were required to be substituted within 90 days (by 20.09.2020), but failed to do so, causing the appeal to abate. The court found the grounds for delay—involving communication delays with counsel and time required to collect details of legal heirs—to be sufficient and bonafide, allowing the substitution application and setting aside the abatement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case