MD KABAD ALI ALIAS KABAT ALI vs THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD AND 2 ORS Advocate - MR. R C PAUL — I.A.(Civil)/364/2026
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 08th May 2026.
CNR: GAHC010013532026
e-Filing Number
26-01-2026
Filing Number
I.A.(Civil)/726/2026
Filing Date
27-Jan-2026
Registration No
I.A.(Civil)/364/2026
Registration Date
09-Feb-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD KABAD ALI ALIAS KABAT ALI
Adv. MR. M M ZAMAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD AND 2 ORS Advocate - MR. R C PAUL
-
2.PRANATI KALITA DAS,
-
3.SRI GAUTAM DAS,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar KalitaView PDF
Summary The Gauhati High Court granted condonation of 389 days delay in filing an appeal against a MACT judgment dated 25.04.2024 in a motor vehicle accident compensation case. The court found sufficient cause for the delay as stated in the application and, with no objection from the respondent's counsel, allowed the interlocutory application. The connected MAC appeal was directed to be registered and listed for admission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Orders
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita
-
30-Mar-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar KalitaView PDF
-
19-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Feb-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik GoswamiView PDF
-
11-Feb-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik GoswamiView PDF
-
27-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/364/2026
Summary The Gauhati High Court granted condonation of 389 days delay in filing an appeal against a MACT judgment dated 25.04.2024 in a motor vehicle accident compensation case. The court found sufficient cause for the delay as stated in the application and, with no objection from the respondent's counsel, allowed the interlocutory application. The connected MAC appeal was directed to be registered and listed for admission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts