SRI DIPU LAL SAHA vs NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD Advocate - MR. R GOSWAMI — I.A.(Civil)/310/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 27th February 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010012582026

e-Filing Number

22-01-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/675/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/310/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

27-Feb-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI DIPU LAL SAHA

    Adv. K U AHMED,E DEVI,E DEVI, ,E DEVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD Advocate - MR. R GOSWAMI

  2. 2.SRI BUDYA SING RONGPI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Honourable Mrs. Justice Susmita Phukan KhaundView PDF

    This is an interlocutory application (I.A./310/2026) in the Gauhati High Court involving Sri Dipu Lal Saha against New India Assurance Company Ltd. On 23.04.2026, the court issued a procedural order noting that the Lower Court Record (LCR) had not been received as called for, and issued a reminder to obtain it. The matter was adjourned for two weeks pending receipt of the case record to enable substantive consideration of the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Feb-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar KalitaView PDF

  4. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/310/2026

casestatus.in Summary

This is an interlocutory application (I.A./310/2026) in the Gauhati High Court involving Sri Dipu Lal Saha against New India Assurance Company Ltd. On 23.04.2026, the court issued a procedural order noting that the Lower Court Record (LCR) had not been received as called for, and issued a reminder to obtain it. The matter was adjourned for two weeks pending receipt of the case record to enable substantive consideration of the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case