M/S SKYLARK INFRA ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS Advocate - SC, PWD, ,SC, K A A C — WP(C)/326/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section ARTICLE 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010008902025

Filing Number

WP(C)/523/2025

Filing Date

10-Jan-2025

Registration No

WP(C)/326/2025

Registration Date

22-Jan-2025

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis Baruah

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis Baruah

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10180 - Award of contracts by the State or its instrumentalities ( 172 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section ARTICLE 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S SKYLARK INFRA ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.

    Adv. MR S J SAIKIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS Advocate - SC, PWD, ,SC, K A A C

  2. 2.DEPUTY SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (BUDGET BRANCH)

  3. 3.PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, KARBI ANGLONG AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL

  4. 4.SECRETARY, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, KARBI-ANGLONG AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL

  5. 5.CHIEF ENGINEER, P.W.D.(ROADS), ASSAM

  6. 6.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD KOHORA ROAD DIVISION

  7. 7.SECRETARY/ CHIEF EXECUTIVE MEMBER, KARBI ANGLONG AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL

  8. 8.EXECUTIVE MEMBER, KARBI ANGLONG AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL

  9. 9.ADDITIONAL CHIEF ENGINEER, PWD(R AND B), HILLS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis BaruahView PDF

    Case Summary: Skylark Infra Engineering Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Assam The Gauhati High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Skylark Infra Engineering seeking payment of Rs. 5,07,80,954/- for road construction work, finding disputed questions of fact that cannot be resolved in writ proceedings. The petitioner claimed work completion and certification by PWD officials with Rs. 3 crore already released, while respondents denied completion, citing approximately 40 meters remaining unfinished and improper bill submission. The court held such factual disputes require evidence-based adjudication in civil court rather than writ jurisdiction, permitting the petitioner to pursue recovery through appropriate civil proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Admission

    Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Manish ChoudhuryView PDF

  5. 12-Dec-2025

    Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis BaruahView PDF

  6. 12-Dec-2025

    Admission

    Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis Baruah

  7. 01-Dec-2025

    Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis BaruahView PDF

  8. 01-Dec-2025

    Admission

    Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis Baruah

  9. 03-Nov-2025

    Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis BaruahView PDF

  10. 08-Sep-2025

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF

  11. 23-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 28-May-2025

    Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar MedhiView PDF

  13. 28-Mar-2025

    Honourable Mr. Justice Arun Dev ChoudhuryView PDF

  14. 24-Jan-2025

    Honourable Mr. Justice Lanusungkum JamirView PDF

  15. 10-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/326/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Skylark Infra Engineering Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Assam The Gauhati High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Skylark Infra Engineering seeking payment of Rs. 5,07,80,954/- for road construction work, finding disputed questions of fact that cannot be resolved in writ proceedings. The petitioner claimed work completion and certification by PWD officials with Rs. 3 crore already released, while respondents denied completion, citing approximately 40 meters remaining unfinished and improper bill submission. The court held such factual disputes require evidence-based adjudication in civil court rather than writ jurisdiction, permitting the petitioner to pursue recovery through appropriate civil proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case