DR. PRASANTA DUTTA vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS Advocate - SC, F C I, ,SC, C.G.C. — WP(C)/419/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GAHC010007322025
Filing Number
WP(C)/411/2025
Filing Date
09-Jan-2025
Registration No
WP(C)/419/2025
Registration Date
27-Jan-2025
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10046 - Salary and allowances with respect to Service of Local Bodies, Banks, State & Central Public Sector Undertaking, Statutory Bodies and Universities a ( 46 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DR. PRASANTA DUTTA
Adv. MRS P HAZARIKA,MS. RIA TIWARI,MS. RIA TIWARI, ,MR. B CHAKRABORTY,MS. RIA TIWARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS Advocate - SC, F C I, ,SC, C.G.C.
-
2.THE FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA
-
3.THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR,
-
4.THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (PERSONNEL)
-
5.THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (ZONE)
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
20-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C)/419/2025 - Dr. Prasanta Dutta v. Union of India & Ors On 20.05.2026, the Gauhati High Court adjourned the matter for four weeks upon request by the respondents' counsel, with consent of the petitioner's counsel obtained. No substantive order on merits was passed; the case stands deferred for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-May-2026
Admission
Honourable Mr. Justice Budi Habung
-
24-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Budi HabungView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Rajesh MazumdarView PDF
-
14-May-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF
-
29-Jan-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Suman ShyamView PDF
-
09-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/419/2025
Case Summary: WP(C)/419/2025 - Dr. Prasanta Dutta v. Union of India & Ors On 20.05.2026, the Gauhati High Court adjourned the matter for four weeks upon request by the respondents' counsel, with consent of the petitioner's counsel obtained. No substantive order on merits was passed; the case stands deferred for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts